Emerald525 Posted February 22, 2011 Share Posted February 22, 2011 You just want to babysit We could do that Alex! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tanktop74 Posted February 22, 2011 Share Posted February 22, 2011 Much better!!! Thank you Alex.... Let me know when we are babysitting again! --- pnwmas.org ping statistics --- 50 packets transmitted, 50 packets received, 0.0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 110.011/134.028/319.792/49.612 ms Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tanktop74 Posted February 22, 2011 Share Posted February 22, 2011 just an update.... site is still faster than it has been in the past week... but I am starting to get some lag time when going from page to page... --- pnwmas.org ping statistics --- 50 packets transmitted, 17 packets received, 66.0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 129.507/132.354/143.296/3.533 ms Here is the traceroute.... i had to finally stop it, didn't seem to be getting where it needed to go. traceroute to pnwmas.org (67.23.230.30), 64 hops max, 52 byte packets 1 10.0.0.1 (10.0.0.1) 4.775 ms 2.243 ms 2.310 ms 2 * * * 3 ge-7-1-ur01.troutdale.or.bverton.comcast.net (68.85.242.229) 12.196 ms 10.149 ms 18.059 ms 4 68.87.218.189 (68.87.218.189) 11.959 ms 10.037 ms 12.284 ms 5 pos-0-8-0-0-cr01.seattle.wa.ibone.comcast.net (68.86.95.93) 15.203 ms pos-0-9-0-0-cr01.seattle.wa.ibone.comcast.net (68.86.95.97) 15.223 ms 18.055 ms 6 te-3-3.car1.seattle1.level3.net (4.79.104.109) 45.834 ms 16.799 ms 17.529 ms 7 ae-32-52.ebr2.seattle1.level3.net (4.68.105.62) 16.304 ms 15.215 ms 15.148 ms 8 ae-2-2.ebr2.denver1.level3.net (4.69.132.54) 52.275 ms 58.456 ms 55.393 ms 9 ae-1-100.ebr1.denver1.level3.net (4.69.132.37) 52.180 ms 52.508 ms 54.703 ms 10 ae-2-2.ebr2.dallas1.level3.net (4.69.132.106) 129.247 ms 134.472 ms 122.790 ms 11 ae-73-78.ebr3.dallas1.level3.net (4.69.146.76) 123.295 ms 131.418 ms 126.169 ms 12 ae-41-41.ebr3.atlanta2.level3.net (4.69.151.178) 124.514 ms 122.077 ms 122.929 ms 13 ae-63-63.csw1.atlanta2.level3.net (4.69.148.242) 123.317 ms ae-73-73.csw2.atlanta2.level3.net (4.69.148.254) 120.201 ms ae-63-63.csw1.atlanta2.level3.net (4.69.148.242) 120.703 ms 14 ae-72-72.ebr2.atlanta2.level3.net (4.69.148.249) 122.545 ms ae-61-61.ebr1.atlanta2.level3.net (4.69.148.233) 122.780 ms 131.973 ms 15 ae-2-2.ebr2.miami1.level3.net (4.69.140.141) 136.286 ms ae-1-8.bar1.orlando1.level3.net (4.69.137.149) 128.899 ms ae-2-2.ebr2.miami1.level3.net (4.69.140.141) 134.566 ms 16 hostdime.com-10g-ethernet.core1.level3.net (67.30.140.2) 134.482 ms ae-3-5.bar2.orlando1.level3.net (4.69.148.210) 138.134 ms hostdime.com-10g-ethernet.core1.level3.net (67.30.140.2) 134.160 ms 17 67-23-230-2.static.dimenoc.com (67.23.230.2) 130.289 ms 131.224 ms ae-0-11.bar1.orlando1.level3.net (4.69.137.145) 133.660 ms 18 hostdime.com-10g-ethernet.core1.level3.net (67.30.140.2) 145.852 ms 139.971 ms * 19 * 67-23-230-2.static.dimenoc.com (67.23.230.2) 136.788 ms 134.509 ms 20 * * * 21 * * * 22 * * * 23 * * * 24 * * * 25 * * * 26 * * * 27 * * * 28 * * * 29 * * * Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XrayGuy Posted February 22, 2011 Share Posted February 22, 2011 Things are getting better here Ping statistics for 67.23.230.30: Packets: Sent = 50, Received = 50, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 93ms, Maximum = 110ms, Average = 97ms Tracing route to pnwmas.org [67.23.230.30] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 1 ms <1 ms 1 ms 192.168.1.1 2 9 ms 11 ms 9 ms 73.90.30.1 3 9 ms 10 ms 11 ms ge-1-19-ur02.vancouver.wa.bverton.comcast.net [6 8.87.219.109] 4 14 ms 9 ms 9 ms te-3-3-ar01.troutdale.or.bverton.comcast.net [68 .85.243.249] 5 15 ms 14 ms 15 ms pos-0-8-0-0-cr01.seattle.wa.ibone.comcast.net [6 8.86.95.93] 6 30 ms 29 ms 29 ms te-3-2.car1.Seattle1.Level3.net [4.79.104.105] 7 39 ms 51 ms 37 ms ae-32-52.ebr2.Seattle1.Level3.net [4.68.105.62] 8 66 ms 58 ms 66 ms ae-2-2.ebr2.Denver1.Level3.net [4.69.132.54] 9 56 ms 70 ms 57 ms ae-1-100.ebr1.Denver1.Level3.net [4.69.132.37] 10 88 ms 89 ms 73 ms ae-2-2.ebr2.Dallas1.Level3.net [4.69.132.106] 11 74 ms 88 ms 72 ms ae-63-68.ebr3.Dallas1.Level3.net [4.69.146.68] 12 85 ms 82 ms 85 ms ae-44-44.ebr3.Atlanta2.Level3.net [4.69.151.190] 13 83 ms 85 ms 83 ms ae-73-73.csw2.Atlanta2.Level3.net [4.69.148.254] 14 86 ms 87 ms 90 ms ae-71-71.ebr1.Atlanta2.Level3.net [4.69.148.245] 15 91 ms 92 ms 90 ms ae-1-8.bar1.Orlando1.Level3.net [4.69.137.149] 16 95 ms 96 ms 96 ms HostDime.com-10G-ethernet.core1.level3.net [67.3 0.140.2] 17 92 ms 91 ms 92 ms 67-23-230-2.static.dimenoc.com [67.23.230.2] 18 98 ms 94 ms 95 ms 67-23-230-30.static.dimenoc.com [67.23.230.30] Trace complete. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grassi Posted February 22, 2011 Share Posted February 22, 2011 Well, I think the php execution time was part of the issue. But we can probably make it run even better. I know that both Marc and Jay are working on some issues. Let's see how it goes. Please keep reporting speed tests and impressions. How about double posts? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emerald525 Posted February 22, 2011 Share Posted February 22, 2011 Pinging and tracing for the PNWMAS Working well this morning! Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600] © Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp. C:\Documents and Settings\kim Vigil>ping -n 50 pnwmas.org Pinging pnwmas.org [67.23.230.30] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 67.23.230.30: bytes=32 time=111ms TTL=45 Reply from 67.23.230.30: bytes=32 time=111ms TTL=45 Reply from 67.23.230.30: bytes=32 time=111ms TTL=45 Reply from 67.23.230.30: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=45 Reply from 67.23.230.30: bytes=32 time=112ms TTL=45 Reply from 67.23.230.30: bytes=32 time=111ms TTL=45 Reply from 67.23.230.30: bytes=32 time=112ms TTL=45 Reply from 67.23.230.30: bytes=32 time=111ms TTL=45 Reply from 67.23.230.30: bytes=32 time=112ms TTL=45 Reply from 67.23.230.30: bytes=32 time=111ms TTL=45 Reply from 67.23.230.30: bytes=32 time=111ms TTL=45 Reply from 67.23.230.30: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=45 Reply from 67.23.230.30: bytes=32 time=111ms TTL=45 Reply from 67.23.230.30: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=45 Reply from 67.23.230.30: bytes=32 time=111ms TTL=45 Reply from 67.23.230.30: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=45 Reply from 67.23.230.30: bytes=32 time=112ms TTL=45 Reply from 67.23.230.30: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=45 Reply from 67.23.230.30: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=45 Reply from 67.23.230.30: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=45 Reply from 67.23.230.30: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=45 Reply from 67.23.230.30: bytes=32 time=114ms TTL=45 Reply from 67.23.230.30: bytes=32 time=111ms TTL=45 Reply from 67.23.230.30: bytes=32 time=111ms TTL=45 Reply from 67.23.230.30: bytes=32 time=113ms TTL=45 Reply from 67.23.230.30: bytes=32 time=112ms TTL=45 Reply from 67.23.230.30: bytes=32 time=111ms TTL=45 Reply from 67.23.230.30: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=45 Reply from 67.23.230.30: bytes=32 time=112ms TTL=45 Reply from 67.23.230.30: bytes=32 time=111ms TTL=45 Reply from 67.23.230.30: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=45 Reply from 67.23.230.30: bytes=32 time=112ms TTL=45 Reply from 67.23.230.30: bytes=32 time=112ms TTL=45 Reply from 67.23.230.30: bytes=32 time=112ms TTL=45 Reply from 67.23.230.30: bytes=32 time=112ms TTL=45 Reply from 67.23.230.30: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=45 Reply from 67.23.230.30: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=45 Reply from 67.23.230.30: bytes=32 time=112ms TTL=45 Ping statistics for 67.23.230.30: Packets: Sent = 38, Received = 38, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 109ms, Maximum = 114ms, Average = 110ms Control-C ^C C:\Documents and Settings\kim Vigil>tracert pnwmas.org Tracing route to pnwmas.org [67.23.230.30] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 3 ms 1 ms 1 ms 10.0.0.1 2 * * * Request timed out. 3 13 ms 9 ms 9 ms ge-7-1-ur01.troutdale.or.bverton.comcast.net [68 .85.242.229] 4 9 ms 9 ms 9 ms 68.87.218.189 5 15 ms 12 ms 13 ms pos-0-9-0-0-cr01.seattle.wa.ibone.comcast.net [6 8.86.95.97] 6 14 ms 14 ms 14 ms te-3-3.car1.Seattle1.Level3.net [4.79.104.109] 7 15 ms 24 ms 13 ms ae-32-52.ebr2.Seattle1.Level3.net [4.68.105.62] 8 46 ms 50 ms 54 ms ae-2-2.ebr2.Denver1.Level3.net [4.69.132.54] 9 51 ms 52 ms 53 ms ae-1-100.ebr1.Denver1.Level3.net [4.69.132.37] 10 107 ms 109 ms 107 ms ae-2-2.ebr2.Dallas1.Level3.net [4.69.132.106] 11 107 ms 108 ms 108 ms ae-73-78.ebr3.Dallas1.Level3.net [4.69.146.76] 12 98 ms 95 ms 96 ms ae-41-41.ebr3.Atlanta2.Level3.net [4.69.151.178] 13 97 ms 95 ms 95 ms ae-73-73.csw2.Atlanta2.Level3.net [4.69.148.254] 14 106 ms 107 ms 108 ms ae-71-71.ebr1.Atlanta2.Level3.net [4.69.148.245] 15 106 ms 195 ms 105 ms ae-1-8.bar1.Orlando1.Level3.net [4.69.137.149] 16 112 ms 109 ms 117 ms HostDime.com-10G-ethernet.core1.level3.net [67.3 0.140.2] 17 106 ms 106 ms 105 ms 67-23-230-2.static.dimenoc.com [67.23.230.2] 18 111 ms 109 ms 110 ms 67-23-230-30.static.dimenoc.com [67.23.230.30] Trace complete. C:\Documents and Settings\kim Vigil> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reefnjunkie Posted February 22, 2011 Author Share Posted February 22, 2011 Quick as it EVER was-at least at my end Thanks for the dilligent work-many appreciate it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jackaninny Posted February 22, 2011 Share Posted February 22, 2011 Beth did you ever try turning off your firewall on your Macbook? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tanktop74 Posted February 22, 2011 Share Posted February 22, 2011 Beth did you ever try turning off your firewall on your Macbook? It was never on when I went to check. So it has been off all along. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emerald525 Posted February 22, 2011 Share Posted February 22, 2011 Working well! Thanks Grassi, Jackaninny and Chief for all your IT help! So far so good and appreciate the time and effort! (clap)(clap)(clap)(clap)(kneel)(drinking) hey Kendra you're right it does kinda hurt your eyes when the font is so big! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jackaninny Posted February 22, 2011 Share Posted February 22, 2011 It was never on when I went to check. So it has been off all along. Excellent Smithers! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Electrokate Posted February 22, 2011 Share Posted February 22, 2011 Thanks guys for all the effort. I do not expect everything to go swimmingly all the time especially on a free site, and when I saw PNWMAS having problems I thought of you guys scrambling to fix them with sympathy... Just watched my husband deal with calPOP server disasters for a week, I know it's hard work dealing with things like this for in many cases no pay. Thank you again, Kate Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael7979 Posted February 22, 2011 Share Posted February 22, 2011 I wanna say thanks to Brad for his new avatar! Get job everyone!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jonas Posted February 22, 2011 Share Posted February 22, 2011 working good today, so far Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael7979 Posted February 22, 2011 Share Posted February 22, 2011 So far today I have had no issues. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reefnjunkie Posted February 23, 2011 Author Share Posted February 23, 2011 Yes thank you thank you thank you, its seems to be back to its good ol speed. Just out of curiosity what was the sit Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grassi Posted February 23, 2011 Share Posted February 23, 2011 Yes thank you thank you thank you, its seems to be back to its good ol speed. Just out of curiosity what was the sit The max execution time and memory of php scripts. I think the server could work faster than now. I still see it slowing down sometimes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reefnjunkie Posted February 23, 2011 Author Share Posted February 23, 2011 The max execution time and memory of php scripts. I think the server could work faster than now. I still see it slowing down sometimes. So was the title of my post remotely accurate-the server was not liking the execution time just something with the word "server" in it so I can, well, tell a few certain individuals "zip it" (laugh) Regardless, Thanks again to all those that took time to help this ol battered ship get its self righted Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grassi Posted February 23, 2011 Share Posted February 23, 2011 So was the title of my post remotely accurate-the server was not liking the execution time just something with the word "server" in it so I can' date=' well, tell a few certain individuals "[b']zip it[/b]" (laugh) Regardless, Thanks again to all those that took time to help this ol battered ship get its self righted You are correct: the server was sucking too much gigabites Thanks to all of you for your patience: we went through a server migration and software update in a few months and there were some issues Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jackaninny Posted February 23, 2011 Share Posted February 23, 2011 We had the flux capacitor plugged in backwards. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mitchell Posted February 23, 2011 Share Posted February 23, 2011 We had the flux capacitor plugged in backwards. You're lucky that didn't mess up the space time continuum lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XrayGuy Posted February 23, 2011 Share Posted February 23, 2011 (clap)Thank you all that helped fix the issues. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stylaster Posted February 28, 2011 Share Posted February 28, 2011 i got this database error today (Feb 28th) when i try to access messages Database error in vBulletin 4.1.0: Invalid SQL: SELECT contenttype.contenttypeid AS itemid FROM contenttype AS contenttype INNER JOIN package AS package ON package.packageid = contenttype.packageid LEFT JOIN product AS product ON product.productid = package.productid WHERE 1 = 1 AND (product.active = '1' OR package.productid = 'vbulletin') AND contenttype.canattach = '1'; MySQL Error : Incorrect information in file: './pnwmas_pnwmas/contenttype.frm' Error Number : 1033 Request Date : Monday, February 28th 2011 @ 07:39:04 AM Error Date : Monday, February 28th 2011 @ 07:39:04 AM Script : http://www.pnwmas.org/forums/private.php Referrer : http://www.pnwmas.org/forums/index.php IP Address : 75.164.155.226 Username : stylaster Classname : vB_Database MySQL Version : 5.0.91-community Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stylaster Posted February 28, 2011 Share Posted February 28, 2011 i got this database error today (Feb 28th) when i try to access messages Database error in vBulletin 4.1.0: Invalid SQL: SELECT contenttype.contenttypeid AS itemid FROM contenttype AS contenttype INNER JOIN package AS package ON package.packageid = contenttype.packageid LEFT JOIN product AS product ON product.productid = package.productid WHERE 1 = 1 AND (product.active = '1' OR package.productid = 'vbulletin') AND contenttype.canattach = '1'; MySQL Error : Incorrect information in file: './pnwmas_pnwmas/contenttype.frm' Error Number : 1033 Request Date : Monday, February 28th 2011 @ 07:39:04 AM Error Date : Monday, February 28th 2011 @ 07:39:04 AM Script : http://www.pnwmas.org/forums/private.php Referrer : http://www.pnwmas.org/forums/index.php IP Address : 75.164.155.226 Username : stylaster Classname : vB_Database MySQL Version : 5.0.91-community Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emerald525 Posted February 28, 2011 Share Posted February 28, 2011 Something wrong with vbulletin? I am having error issues as well. When I tried to refresh to new posts I get this: Database Error Database error The PNWMAS database has encountered a problem. Please try the following: * Load the page again by clicking the Refresh button in your web browser. * Open the www.pnwmas.org home page, then try to open another page. * Click the Back button to try another link. The www.pnwmas.org forum technical staff have been notified of the error, though you may contact them if the problem persists. We apologise for any inconvenience. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.