Jump to content

Nate213

Members
  • Posts

    628
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Posts posted by Nate213

  1. I am maintaining high Mg to rid my 150 of bryopsis. I used magnesium from BRS and mixed up a solution. Then I used the BRS calculator to calculate the dosing amount to raise levels over 1500. I used my doser to add the amount over several days. I have been holding this level for several weeks and it is working great. Bryopsis is dying and no adverse effect on corals.

  2. MH are cheap. You could get everything up and running with MH and then switch to LEDs at a later date. That way you would get the system all dialed in and know you have everything right before you play with lighting.

     

    The biggest disadvantage of LEDs (in my opinion) is the inconsistency. Some people have great luck and others terrible. There are lots of sale threads with new high end LED fixtures that didn't work. It makes me a little worried about the ones I bought, but I am up for a challenge and know the rest of my system is solid. If my corals start to suffer it will be a good probability that it is the lighting. With a brand new build it may be harder to determine the problem.

  3. ^ you really only need the two pumps. I have the four pump model but one isn't being used. I do dose magnesium but at a very low rate, and only because I have the extra pumps to do so.

     

    I also have a separate top off system. I personally wouldn't use a dosing pump for top off, but I suppose you could.

  4. Thanks you guys for the great input. I was kinda leaning towards the dosing pumps' date=' I bought a reactor and sold it before I even used it because it looked like a lot to worry about during the initial setup. What are the costs for reactor media and co2 vs the dosing liquids(or powders)? What is a good dosing pump? I don't like to go cheap, I have learned that you will more than likely be replacing cheap stuff later on down the road, like my s**tty coralife skimmer that won't create the vortex in the chamber like it used to and was constantly overflowing.[/quote']

     

    I was spending about the same per year on media, maybe slightly more with 2-part. I went through 2 gallons of ARM extra coarse reactor media every 12-14 months. I expect to go through a couple of gallons of the dry 2-part media this year. Next time I will buy in bulk to reduce the cost.

     

    I have heard good things about the Bubble Magnus dosing pumps and I am partial to the Profilux (only because I haven't used the BM). The BRS dosing pumps require timers or controllers, but they are less expensive. Both the Bubble Magnus and Profilux have built in controllers.

     

    http://www.aquacave.com/GHL-ProfiLux-Stand-Alone-Dosing-System-4-Pumps-w-Controller-P2939C835.aspx

     

    http://www.saltysupply.com/product-p/bm1163.htm

  5. I have manually dosed, upgraded to a reactor and then upgraded to an auto doser. Both the reactor and auto doser are worlds better than manually dosing.

     

    My issues with the reactor were the constant maintenance and refilling of the media. As the media breaks down the reactor gets restricted and the flow changes. It seems like I was always cleaning it out or adjusting the flow. I had to take it offline every 3-5 months to completely clean and replace the media. I was always worried about excess CO2 and constantly monitored my bubble counter and flow. I also had to monitor and clean the feed pump. Average PH was slightly low while running the reactor.

     

    I upgraded to a Profilux doser and am very happy. Once I got it dialed in, it is very little maintenance. I refill the solutions (2-part plus mag) about every four months or so as needed and do bi weekly checks to see if the settings need to be adjusted. So far this setup is easier and less stress for me. PH is very stable and swings between a low of 8.1 to a high of 8.3.

     

    I still have my reactor, but I don't see myself going back anytime in the future.

  6. I saw a build thread where the guy put down a very thin layer of sand and put down resin or some clear coating over it. It looked like the tank had a sand bed, but was essentially BB. I can't seem to find the thread again. I believe it was on RC.

     

    I like the cleanness of BB tanks, but not how the bottom looks after it gets all coated with coralline algae. If the appearance thing could be fixed, I would also consider going that route.

  7.  

    Cool!! So... I wonder where I could find the size information on this. We need a skimmer that isn't taller than like 23 inches I think.... Also, can people even buy these yet or are they just coming out??

     

     

    Looks like it is just under 22" tall;

     

    http://www.aquariumspecialty.com/protein-skimmers/internal-skimmers/rlss/reef-life-support-systems-r10-i-protein-skimmer

  8. My cleaner has never caused any problems with my LPS, but I had some peppermints that were very fond of them. Once they rid my tank of aptasia they developed a taste for acans and Duncans.

  9. LOL...mhmmm... I died a little inside when he said we might have to go custom. But' date=' it's all for a good cause, right?! (rock2)[/quote']

     

    Custom is the way to go for most things in this hobby. Everyone has different needs and goals. If a manufacturer sold a perfect setup that worked for everyone, we would all buy it and then figure out how to screw it up so that we could customize it. ;)

  10. Pros to MH: lower cost, proven to grow corals, standard in hobby, easy to setup.

     

    Cons to MH: heat, energy consumption, changing bulbs yearly.

     

    Pros to LED: lower energy consumption, lower heat, no yearly bulb changes, dimming capability, customizable spectrum.

     

    Cons to LED: not proven, new to hobby so people have mixed results, high initial cost, more difficult to setup properly.

×
×
  • Create New...