milesmiles902

Echinoderm: EarthBound

Give a round of applause for: EarthBound

Current Goal: Design and curate multiple cartoon fish to circle around the structure in both Photoshop and 3dsMax. Primary Animations: Regal Tang, Yellow Tang, Emperor Angelfish, Clownfish Secondary Animations: Anemone, Crabs, StarFish, Shells, Seaweed Use Color Wheel of Fish: https://color.adobe.com/create/color-wheel/ Submit to Contest: https://decentraland.org/blog/platform/creator-contest-faq Background Resources: Basics: https://dclplazas.com/build-on-decentraland/ Examples: https://dclplazas.com/build-on-decentraland/decentraland-games/ Tutorial: http://www.polygonalmind.com/blog

Unsure on the gallons, but why don't you drain it and replace the piece? I'm sure on this forum, if you post pictures of the drained tank you can find someone to help.

Isn't there ways to fix acrylic? Also, depends on the plastic, since H2O2 can do damage to some.

His name is boots.

^

I've thought about going and removing the Photobucket sign, but it's a nice touch

Let's see some more photos. Also, you could attempt to compete with the world's best pets:

Welcome to the Pacific Northwest Marine Aquarium Society. Make yourself at home. Namaste.

It also said: Let's see some photo's with your favorite pet. It can be a land or water dweller. No worries.

Also, I said the photo had to be taken by a friend or family member. Reminds me of this thread:

I swore I wrote, Photo with favorite pet. Eh, I'll change it to: photo of favorite pet.

Here are the rules:  • One photo entry per person • Pic has to be taken by you • Must be in by the posted deadline • Must follow subject guidelines for the month Winners will be determined based on voting poll results after submission deadline. This months subject: Let's see some photo's of your favorite pet. It can be a land or water dweller. Deadline: March 1st, 11:59 pm

Voting Closes: 11:59 pm February 8th, 2019

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-07798-9

Respect.

Cuttlefish and Corals - I don't believe it, till I see a cuttlefish.

As stated in the article, having a backed database of all strains is critical to evaluating the quality of a micro-biome.

Evaluating Methods for Studying Microbial Biodiversity As mentioned above, nearly all of the publications addressing the evaluation of methods for studying microbial biodiversity (theme Methods) focused on evaluating laboratory methods for characterizing microorganisms or their DNA. Nevertheless, we could distinguish between methods that were evaluated based on environmental samples and those that were evaluated based on strains from collections. For the former, we noted whether multiple independent samples were employed in the study, and for the latter, we noted whether an independent collection of strains was used to validate the method (Fig. 2). Among the 94 publications analyzed under this theme, 85% were based on environmental samples (aliquots of water or soil, for example) and the remainder were based on strains from collections to evaluate methods of characterization. For the studies employing environmental samples, about 75% exploited multiple samples as the basis for evaluating the method. In the other 25% of studies, the evaluation of the method was based on only a single environmental sample. None of the studies employing strains from laboratories or national collections validated their conclusion with results from a second independent collection of strains. In some cases, independent collections have been combined to determine the genetic diversity within a given species. Tamplin et al. (259) used two laboratory collections (53 environmental and 78 clinical isolates) to determine the genetic variability within Vibrio vulnificus. https://mmbr.asm.org/content/66/4/592